🔗 Share this article

Throughout economic booms, there come moments where market analysts question if optimism has become unreasonable.

Recent multibillion-dollar agreements between OpenAI and semiconductor makers NVIDIA along with AMD have raised questions about the viability of substantial investments in artificial intelligence technology.

Why these NVIDIA and AMD Deals Concerning to Market Observers?

Several commentators voice concern regarding the circular structure of such arrangements. According to the conditions for the Nvidia agreement, OpenAI agrees to pay the chipmaker with cash to acquire processors, while Nvidia will invest into OpenAI in exchange for non-controlling shares.

Leading UK technology backer James Anderson expressed concern about parallels with vendor financing, where a company provides monetary assistance to a customer purchasing its products – a precarious situation when these customers hold excessively positive revenue forecasts.

Vendor financing proved to be one of the characteristics of that late 1990s dot-com bubble.

"It's not exactly similar to what many telecommunications suppliers engaged in in 1999-2000, but there are some similarities to it. I don't think it makes me feeling entirely at ease in that perspective regarding this," commented Anderson.

The AMD deal further enmeshes OpenAI with another chip maker in addition to Nvidia. Under the agreement, OpenAI will use hundreds of thousands of AMD chips in their datacentres – the central nervous systems of artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT – while gaining an opportunity to buy 10% in AMD.

All of this is being driven by the insatiable demand of OpenAI as well as competitors to secure the maximum computing power as possible to push AI systems to ever greater capability breakthroughs – as well as to satisfy growing user demand.

Neil Wilson, UK market strategist with investment bank Saxo, stated how deals such as those between Nvidia & OpenAI collectively pointed to circumstances which "looks, smells and sounds like a bubble."

Which Are Additional Indicators Pointing to Market Exuberance?

Anderson highlighted soaring market values at leading AI companies as a further cause for worry. OpenAI currently valued at $500bn (£372 billion), compared with $157 billion in October last year, whereas Anthropic almost tripled its valuation recently, going from $60 billion in March to $170bn the previous month.

Anderson stated how the magnitude behind these value increases "concerned him." Reports indicate, OpenAI supposedly posted revenue of $4.3 billion in the first half of the current year, with operational losses of $7.8 billion, according to technology publication The Information.

Recent share price swings have also alarmed seasoned market watchers. As an example, AMD temporarily gained $80 billion in valuation during equity activity this past Monday following the OpenAI announcement, whereas Oracle – a beneficiary from need for AI support systems like datacentres – gained approximately $250 billion over one day in September following announcing better than expected earnings.

There is also a huge investment spending surge, which refers to spending for non-staff costs including buildings as well as equipment. The major quartet artificial intelligence "large-scale operators" – Facebook parent Meta, Google parent Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon – are expected to spend $325 billion on capex in the current year, approximately the economic output of Portugal.

Is Artificial Intelligence Implementation Justifying Market Excitement?

Faith in artificial intelligence expansion was rattled this past August after the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published a study showing that 95% of companies are getting no return on money spent toward generative AI. The study said the problem was not the capabilities of AI systems rather the manner in they were used.

It said this was an obvious manifestation of the "AI adoption gap", with startups led by young entrepreneurs reporting a jump in income from using AI tools.

These findings coincided with a substantial decline in AI infrastructure stocks such as Nvidia and Oracle. This happened 60 days after McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, said that eight out of 10 companies report utilize genAI, however the same proportion report no significant impact on their profitability.

McKinsey said this occurs because AI tools are utilized for broad purposes like creating conference summaries rather than targeted uses such as highlighting risky vendors and generating concepts.

Everything here unnerves backers since an important promise from AI companies like Alphabet, OpenAI and Microsoft is that when organizations purchase their products, they will enhance efficiency – an indicator for economic efficiency – through enabling an individual worker accomplish much more profitable output in an average working day.

Nevertheless, there are other obvious indications of broad adoption of AI. This week, OpenAI stated how ChatGPT is now accessed among 800 million people a week, up from the number of 500 million cited by the company last March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, strongly maintains how interest for premium access for AI will persist in "steeply increase."

What Does the Bigger Picture Reveal?

Adrian Cox, an investment strategist at Deutsche Bank's research division, says present circumstances feels like "we are at a crossroads when signals are flashing different colours."

The red lights, he notes, include massive capital expenditure wherein "the current generation of processors might become obsolete prior to spending yields returns" and rapidly increasing valuations of privately-held firms like OpenAI.

The amber signals involve a more than doubling of the share prices belonging to the "top seven" US tech stocks. This is balanced through their price to earnings ratios – an assessment of whether an investment stands fairly priced or not – which are under historical levels